Is it unreasonable to have your top 10 of this decade to start like this

1)Arcade Fire - Funeral
2)Arcade Fire - neon Bible
3)Radiohead - Kid A
4)Radiohead - In Rainbows

I know most dont feel this way, and it boths me I have no fillers to put between. when I do I just get pissed off and change it back.

This is a question for my fellow crazies out there.

If that's your opinion, I'd keep it like that. For example, the fact that it turns out I have 7 songs from Bob Dylan in my top 10 of 1965 doesn't make me change the list because it's one-sided. It makes no sense including others in between just because certain artists have successive albums/songs in the list.

When it comes to music taste, nothing is unreasonable. It's a human right to have freedom of taste, right?