Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Watch YRKKH Today Episode Online live on Star Plus. YO Desi Serial Yeh Rishtha Kya Kehla Hai Today Episode Latest Full Episode Online Hindi Drama in HD QUality.
Yeh Rishtha Kya Kehla Hai Today Episode
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Henrik
Because of time limitations, I cannot include all critics lists in the world. I have to prioritise and therefore I have set up some rules. The following types of lists are not included in the calculation of Acclaimed Music's top 2000 albums and singles of all time.
Henrik,
I just discovered your site, in the process of researching a book, and it has been fabulously informative! Many thanks,
There is one list I've used for reference which I haven't seen mentioned, either in the official lists or this "don't meet criteria" forum, but which seems to me like it would be well worth using: The
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Henrik
Because of time limitations, I cannot include all critics lists in the world. I have to prioritise and therefore I have set up some rules. The following types of lists are not included in the calculation of Acclaimed Music's top 2000 albums and singles of all time.
Henrik,
I just discovered your site, in the process of researching a book, and it has been fabulously informative! Many thanks,
There is one list I've used for reference which I haven't seen mentioned, either in the official lists or this "don't meet criteria" forum, but which seems to me like it would be well worth using: The National Recording Registry of the Library of Congress.
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
What makes a someone a music critic? Do they have to write a book? For example, I just found this list http://www.squidoo.com/200songs
Is that a critic's list? He took the time to rank the songs.
Also, let's say rolling stone revisted their greatest songs list (not just add in songs like they did, but actually have new voters vote on a new list completly). Would you rank both lists of just the new one?
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Hands down, this is one of the best music ranking sites I have ever come across. Keep up the superb work here at Acclaimed Music.
I have a question about an album list I recently discovered. I'm not sure if it meets your criteria. It is entitled, "1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die" - edited by Robert Dimery and published by Quintessence Editions Ltd. This album list currently draws from the 1955 - 2009 time-frame. You can see this diverse list for yourself at: http://1001beforeyoudie.com
Just click on view albums list and sort it by release date. Enjoy!
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Thanks for the update. I had a feeling that you included it, but wasn't sure. If you ever need any help with anything on here, I would volunteer myself for this cause. Great stuff!
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
I would love to play this game. Although, I have to say that I haven't even begun to officially rank my all-time favorite albums. I listen to music from every era and (nearly) every genre / sub-genre. Should I give it a go anyways? Or should I do my list from a specific year or genre? (:
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Ryan
I would love to play this game. Although, I have to say that I haven't even begun to officially rank my all-time favorite albums. I listen to music from every era and (nearly) every genre / sub-genre. Should I give it a go anyways? Or should I do my list from a specific year or genre? (:
Obviously reader/listener lists are not part of the site. What about lists that incorporate readers/listeners, but also with the input of editors and writers. I came across this Gibson.com 80s list. While it says "most importantly- readers"- which probably is to make readers feel "special"- you can compare the final list with the readers' top 25:
Doesn't look like reader input was that strong- I count 11 of the readers' top 25 that ended up in the top 50 (with only four songs appearing in both top 20 lists). But, I'll leave it to your further examination. :)
And, yes, I obviously think it's very cool that a guitar-oriented company/site would have two Madonna songs in a top 50.
Obviously reader/listener lists are not part of the site. What about lists that incorporate readers/listeners, but also with the input of editors and writers. I came across this Gibson.com 80s list. While it says "most importantly- readers"- which probably is to make readers feel "special"- you can compare the final list with the readers' top 25:
Doesn't look like reader input was that strong- I count 11 of the readers' top 25 that ended up in the top 50 (with only four songs appearing in both top 20 lists). But, I'll leave it to your further examination. :)
And, yes, I obviously think it's very cool that a guitar-oriented company/site would have two Madonna songs in a top 50.
I don't think I have ever included a list before where they state that the readers poll was reflected in the overall list, so I think I will have to deem this one ineligible. Sorry, JR.
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Henry
How about the VH1 decade lists such as the 2000's as provided at http://www.gossipcop.com/vh1-100-greatest-songs-2000s-full-list-complete-rankings/
I really hope that list isn't eligible (for obvious reasons). I managed to watch a little of it yesterday (and I ended up heckling the commentators on the TV), and a lot fo the commentators (who I think were also the voters) were non-critics like people from Jersey Shore, Mob Wives and comedians.
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
How about the following lists from Rolling Stone Magazine for 2011:
Top 50 songs:
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/50-best-singles-of-2011-20111207?utm_source=dailynewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
and
Top 50 albums
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/50-best-albums-of-2011-20111207?utm_source=dailynewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
A couple of those would definitely appear on my list but a few I also just consider good songs, like Pardon Me. I suppose anything associated with that late 90s post-post grunge area would potentially be considered embarrassing.
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
I really like your article. It’s evident that you have a lot of knowledge on this topic. Your points are well made and relatable.. Best Black Magic Specialist in Bhopal
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
I have read your article couple of times because your views are on my own for the most part. It is great content for every reader. surah to get love back
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Henrik
Because of time limitations, I cannot include all critics lists in the world. I have to prioritise and therefore I have set up some rules. The following types of lists are not included in the calculation of Acclaimed Music's top 2000 albums and singles of all time.
* end of year lists from individual critics
* genre-specific lists from non-genre specific sources
* readers'/listeners' lists
* lists of artists
* lists of collection albums
* lists of classical music
* lists of jazz and world music (will be included in the future)
However, I will create a new page on the site, with lists that didn't meet the criteria for inclusion. I thought that maybe you would like to help me get going with this, by adding lists here. Please list here any lists you think should be mentioned.
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
There are so many places where I write weird information no matter what I search these days, but you have all the information I'm looking for, so I'll visit often again. Thank you.메이저안전놀이터
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Thank you! The lists I'm hoping for here are the lists of 100 songs and albums. If there are any others that meet the criteria of AM, feel free to post them as well!... spell to make him call
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
As I am looking at your writing, I regret being unable to do outdoor activities due to Corona 19, and I miss my old daily life. If you also miss the daily life of those days, would you please visit my site once? My site is a site where I post about photos and daily life when I was free.keo nha cai
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
I'm reading your writings well. I think you're really trying to share your knowledge and thoughts. I understand how hard it is to write on a blog. I want to applaud your efforts. I want to keep seeing your article. I'll do the bookmark. Thank you. 토토사이트
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
Papers get to operate through Bible helpers and also plagiarism checkers to be certain that the author did not find idle at any stage in the process. Language inconsistencies won't be a thing with your newspapers as the specialists of our school paper writing support are passionate about writing and are always excited to strike you with something fresh. By: 사설토토
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
I finally found the information I was looking for on your blog. You can't be happier than this. I want to say thank you so much for posting this. Please continue to post good comments. 메이저토토
Re: Lists that don't meet the Acclaimed Music criteria
good concept . thanks for sharing . However Bruno and I appear to agree on the Irish Times song list being eligible ... in the title either, so I don't think we can hold that against them. Mayong Assam tantrik contact number