Is that measurement on the same frame? The sidecar mounting lug hole looks smaller than the other picture? If it is, it's a civvie frame as the WD frame is about 7" and the civvie is about 9"
I was measuring my mates 35 frame at the Norton owners meeting last month. Otherwise it was the same as an early WD frame with up right seat mounts.
The frame number looks to me like an original stamping and everything fits for a 1935 civilian frame...although after a bit of research, I can say that it seems to have been an interesting one.
Frame 56911 was part of a batch of 30 model 19s finished in grey with 3 gallon tank, folding Kickstart and Crankcase shields. Despatched 25th April 1935 to the United Africa Company, Dakar.
It was clearly destined for 'Colonial' use but whether that was by a government agency in West Africa or a commercial organisation will probably remain a mystery.
That sounds like a fantastic bike, a grey Model 19 with extras. I would have to try and build it back to that now
Correct me if I'm wrong Rik, but wasn't the "Colonial" Norton's given the higher ground-clearance frame? I'm sure I read that somewhere, but that maybe for earlier bikes.
Ah, just answering my own question, a 600cc Model 19 engine wouldn't fit in the higher ground-clearance frame, but a 500cc engine will
The 'Colonial' spec related to the Model 16'C' in the 1920s. It seems to have disappeared with the last of the flat-tankers. There was no 16C in the post-1932 Edgar Franks range.
Yep, a grey Norton with a crankcase shield, a solar topee and breeches...I like the sound of that pose !
Thanks Rik, I thought it might be for earlier bikes
A 1935 Model 19 would have the open valve engine with parallel pushrods, lovely if you can find one
Many thanks for your respond and comments. It comes to conclude that the frame is not WD frame.
I am very far away from all you experience about Norton bike. Nice group here..