Questions? Looking for parts? Parts for sale? or just for a chat,

The WD Motorcycle forum

WD Motorcycle forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

I've got examples of at least 10 markings which I've only ever seen on BSA engines, and this is one of them. So I guess it's got something to do with early BSA quality control...?

694c-1
All-C10-008

email (option): wd.register@gmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Ah I knew I'd see that marking somewhere? On my C10 engine. Thanks Jan:relaxed: Ron

email (option): ronpier@talk21.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Sunrise? Hedgehog? ...? 😄

email (option): wd.register@gmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

I believe it is an inspection quality stamp.
It is on every Cam, flywheel, rocker box. cush drive bearing and driveshaft of my 20’s and 30’s BSA’s

I am yet to find it on my teens bikes.

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

I just checked and my WC10 has that marking also. Despite being a 1940 model, these were all despatched to the WO in Aug-Sept 1939 ( Also still fitted with the NiFe batteries) Ron

DSCF5209-2

email (option): ronpier@talk21.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

It's not on my KC11 engine, there is a letter Y under the number though.
Wonder what that's about?

I know that KC and C11's weren't used by the Military, so maybe it's a WD thing only?

Lex

email (option): welbike@welb***.net

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Unlike the JLO stamp (indicating a rebuild in the JLO factory in occupied Germany, see examples below), this can't be a WD marking, as Daryll found the same marking on every cam, flywheel, rocker box etc. of his 1920’s and 1930’s BSAs. And I've never seen this zigzag marking on a Matchless / Enfield / Triumph / Norton / Ariel...

40-G3-8913-002
bsa7
Crankcase-W4187
DSCN7543
DSCN7941
DSCN8039
JLORebuild-AS19922
s-l1600-10
s-l1600-22

email (option): wd.register@gmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

BSA (internal) quality inspection stamp is what I was referring to Jan.

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Indeed, that’s what I was also suggesting Darryl! 😊

email (option): wd.register@gmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

I sent Nick a series of photos, and I don’t know who Darryl is 🤪

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

There you go Daren.


88-FE3969-BBB1-4-C9-B-9-D9-D-06-A68-D10866-A
9-F458-A77-60-B2-47-D4-B262-79-A89-EC19982
A7217442-C66-A-412-E-B0-AE-CDB23-FA3-BC32
BE3-D7-D95-5-B5-B-499-B-B022-D9444-B675-E8-C

email (option): bsawm20@hotmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

That's all pretty convincing ! I wonder if individual quality contollers at BSA had their own stamps, similar to how the later ministry inspectors had a unique number. It would explain why the symbol doesn't appear on all engines or parts and that there are apparently others too.

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Would the stamp on a gear have to be done before amy hardening processes? if so its not really finished.

rob

email (option): robmiller11(a)yahoo.co.uk

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Sorry Darren, errare humanum est... 😊

I'm sure there were also other BSA quality inspector's markings. See examples below. I've never seen any of these on another make.

First example: number 51:

54246-2
62649-2
96341-1
M20-021

Second example: BSA F5:

102154-2
107448-2

Third example: B on a hammer:

3093774970-b6c29b99dd-b

Plus some combinations:

bsa-acceptance-marking
IMGP1570

Message to the forum members: please have a look at your engines, and please share what you found. Either by adding the pictures to this thread, or you can also send them to me by email (address below).

Jan

email (option): wd.register@gmail.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Back when these bikes were made most of the tooling was plain high carbon steel which goes dull fairly quickly
From the days of the Round Tank BSa used production line workers to do the machining of parts rather than fitters or machinists.
The machines were production line machines which worked between fixed stops so as a tool wore there was no way of compensating on the fly.
The operator would have a series of go / no-go testing gauges and they would check each & every part as it came off the machine
Most times it would then go into a stillage according to which gauge it fitted.
The stillages then went to a QC inspection station where better gauges were used to grade all of the parts and each grade would get a stamp so at a latter date say an oversized bushing hole could be matched up with an oversized bush.
When a certain threshold of out of spec parts came off a machine, the operator hits the OFF button and calls for the machine fitter / tool setter to come over and correct the machine .
The cycle continues at infinatium till the run of that part finished.
THus the original engines were sort of blueprinted to achieve the best overall fit .
So if you look hard you will see a massive amount of stamp marks all over the engine, many of them so small you need a strong magnifier to identify them .
Then here wer other numbers like those on the front engine mount that signify that those 2 parts were machined together so when reassembled they have to go back together so the crank shaft is perpendicular to the bore
Where I see this variation most often is with the magneto plaatform
Originally they were machined together so were flat
When you replace a left or right case half often there would be a step on the platform.

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Commonly referred to as 'selective assembly' and used widely and routinely in the days before CNC machining tolerances and consistency...For a 'modern' engine that employs the system to a degree you need look no further than an early to mid 2000s Harley Davidson Sportster....There may be others...
It's worth considering when rebuilding your old army machine with say, a nos set of timing gears bought from different suppliers that the tolerances might not be correct and will still require careful checking (ask me how I know)...Theoretically, at least, you ideally need a full set of 'matched' gears...Ian

email (option): ian@wright52.plus.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

Ian is it at all possible to achieve selectively match parts or at least a complete set of matched gears these days? Ron

email (option): ronpier@talk21.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

It's a lottery really...Without knowing how many tolerance classifications there were, how close the tolerances would be and how many spares there are for any given part it's impossible to calculate the odds of achieving a match...
I've used 'full sets' of mix and match gears a number of times and achieved mixed results...I've had good sets and some where the gear tooth clearance was insufficient...Ian

email (option): ian@wright52.plus.com

Re: Marking on (early) BSA M20 engine

This is partly why I've put a new set of gears, shafts and forks in my gearbox. Even then it's taken some selective fitting to get things in the correct places.
One sin often committed is to run a new gear with a worn one.
Oh, what fun we have.

Mark

email (option): pes.sales@btconnect.com

Nieuwe pagina 1