Questions? Looking for parts? Parts for sale? or just for a chat,

The WD Motorcycle forum

WD Motorcycle forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
Values we share.

Here's a good read for a quiet day when holiday obligations keep us around the hearth and away from the shed. Yes, Crawford writes from an American perspective but his essay on the dignity of work should strike a cord in all of us.

He followed this piece with a book of the same name, which I recommend.

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/shop-class-as-soulcraft

Jeff Bandola

email (option): jjbandoo@aol.com

Re: Values we share.

Thanks Jeff. I enjoyed that.

Re: Values we share.

Politicians, economists, bankers 'et al'..they would all be sat naked in a field scraping on a slate with a stick if it wasn't for Engineers....Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

They would be drinking their own piss and eating grass if it wasnt for the engineers building water purification plants and transporting food for them.

email (option): Gasboy@btinternet.com

Re: Values we share.

There's a nice quote from the flyleaf of Nevil Shute's autobiography SLIDE RULE that reads: An engineer is a man who can do for ten shillings what any fool can do for a pound.

It's a book worth reading. Nevil Shute wasn't simply a best selling author. He was a great engineer who worked on the R100 airship (the one that didn't crash) and was a founder of Airspeed Ltd after leaving Vickers.

For the benefit on anyone not familiar with old British currency, ten shillings is 50 pence, or half of one pound.

P.S. If the quote isn't from that book, it's from his novel TRUSTEE FROM THE TOOL ROOM. A worthy book for engineering minded people who will appreciate it best.

email (option): dannydefazio@sumpmagazine.com

Re: Values we share.

You had better explain what a 'slide rule' is as well Danny!!...I really must try to get a copy of these books, which we have discussed before.
Another saying...'An optimist says the glass is half full...a pessimist that it is half empty...while an Engineer says it is too big'...Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

The sad truth is that I can find people that appreciate what I do, but I cannot find anyone who is interested in learning what I do. I have had people who want to have a go at what I do , but not stick at it. I once took on a "apprentice" who was supposed to be so clued up he was actually better than me! The truth is that he only knew about health and safety. I fear that as I get older fewer and fewer people will take on the kind of jobs that I do until it becomes a "lost art". I used to do rebores on a very regular basis, the only ones I do now are for classic bikes, not a single one for a modern bike, if a Jap 4 drops a valve, they replace the whole engine. I do fear that in the UK the engineers "art" will be completely lost within a couple of generations.
I'm interested in Ians opinions on this subject as he, probably, like myself is proud of what he does and I'm sure that he feels that he too is becoming more and more detatched from the modern world (in a motorcycle sense)as no one seems interested in learning the skills (I only have qualifications in car mechanics obtained in a "contact breaker" era) I don't think of myself as being that skilled, just "in touch" with what I'm doing and willing to spend time solving problems, yet no one seems to want to learn the skills.
As for a slide rule, I at least have a piece of modern technology that beats that one.........a pocket calculator!!!

email (option): davmax@ntlworld.com

Re: Values we share.

Hi Dave, I grew up at a time when slide rules (or slipsticks) were going out of fashion, but I think they can actually do quite a few things that calculators can't do. Additionally, they're supposed to engage your brain a lot more than a calculator does, which is no bad thing. Also, if you sit in a pub studying one, people will think you're intelligent.

However, being pretty useless with numbers, I never had to worry about them, which makes me always slightly in awe of people who can talk intelligently about thousandths of an inch and microns, etc.

But surely you'd be in favour of people retaining these old skills?

As a footnote, I hear that Japanese bank tellers will still occasionally use an abacus as some feel they're faster than a calculator (and a lot more satisfying to use). It's nice to know that in a high tech world, there's still a place for low tech devices.

email (option): dannydefazio@sumpmagazine.com

Re: Values we share.

I can still read a slide rule, but it's easier to read a calculator if your eyes are dodgy!

email (option): davmax@ntlworld.com

Re: Values we share.

I'm sure if you visit many other 'developed' and 'third world' countries you will find no shortage of the skills under discussion. It is just a sad fact that in this country (run by Barristers, 'professional' politicians and money men) a choice was made some while back that manufacturing and the skills that go with it was neither necessary nor desirable in the new 'post industrialist' age. In the new model the service and financial sectors would provide all the wealth and jobs....
Not a brilliant plan as it has turned out..not everyone was suitable for employment in those sectors that were to be our sole means of generating wealth..and then their was the greed and incompetence of the Bankers.
This narrow view of the world has meant manufacturing has been left to 'wither on the vine',has not been supported in any way and the educational system (also run by people with no understanding of Industry) has produced generations of children who largely believe that physical work is demeaning and 'second rate'..as they have been taught.
When I started my Engineering career,along with thousands of other school leavers at the time, a large percentage of the population were involved in manufacturing and related trades and were highly skilled in those areas.
Now less and less people have any understanding or interest in how all the things they use are made and how they work...and Engineering is destined to become a totally lost art that we rely entirely on others to carry out for us...sad, sad, sad...Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

I still work in engineering, one of the few companies still running in this area. We have a factory in China but the management (there's a misnomer if ever there was one) have admitted it was not the economic miracle they were looking for. We shipped thousands of robot welded parts from there and found two major problems. One was the quality of the steel and the second was that they added two extra welds to the cross members for 'strength'. As most welders will know, adding weld for strength is the wrong thing to do, allowing stresses to move across the welded area into an unsuitable area. That's why gussets have a gap, for instance between the headstock and frame of a chopped bike.
I did an apprenticeship with the gas board and then worked as a mechanical fitter for many years and one of the things I saw amazed me that British industry did not go sooner. A lack of investment in machinery and people killed it as surely as a bullet to the brain. British Timken had machines with 'War Production' cast into it and we took guesses as to which war.......

email (option): stinkypete80@hotmail.com

Re: Values we share.

I see that the decline of the skilled trades is just as much an issue in the UK as the US. Crawford's essay speaks to many dilemmas I have faced, ultimately becoming a "knowledge worker" but keeping my hands dirty with race cars and classic bikes since 3 years employment as a motorcycle mechanic during my university years. In the arrogance of youth I presented myself to a Norton/Ducati/Kawasaki dealer as a mechanic, having rebuilt exactly one bike, a 1946 Indian Chief, while in high school. While I began as an overconfident young fool I emerged after 3 years as a passable mechanic, with skills and mindset that have served me well over 40 years. It gives me great pleasure to share knowledge and values with this fine group.

Please explain to me what constitutes an "engineer" in british parlance.

Jeff

email (option): jjbandoo@aol.com

Re: Values we share.

Hi Jeff..The word 'engineer' covers a wide range of disciplines in the English language context. The word derives from the Latin word 'Ingenium' meaning 'skill' or 'talent'.
The dictionary gives the following description..in the profession of applying scientific principles to the design, construction and maintenance of machines etc.(Mechanical Engineering), Buildings, bridges,roads etc. (Civil Engineering).. and there are similar descriptions for Electrical Engineering, Chemical Engineering etc. etc.
My training as a Mechanical Engineer took the form of a 5 year apprenticeship..this meant I was taken on by a company involved in one of the relevant disciplines and they trained me in the basic principles, theory and all aspects of the practical side of Mechanical Engineering. I did one years basic training, three years of general mechanical engineering, one years specialisation (in the last year) and one day and one evening a week at college for the whole 5 years.
After the successful completion of that I was awarded my indentures...this was the original 'contract' that I had signed between myself and my Employer at the beginning. I also got a certificate which confirmed my qualification as a trained Mechanical Engineer...I was then a 'Time Served' Engineer
At that time you could not obtain employment as an Engineer at any level without presenting those documents.
From that basic point there were further opportunities to obtain higher and more specialised qualifications but these were optional and only limited by your own ambition and abilities.
It was generally accepted that after the 5 year apprenticeship you were qualified but you would then spend many more years improving and refining your skills and knowledge base.....Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

Ian I always narrow your profession down to 'Precision Engineer' Would that be correct? Ron

email (option): ronpier@talk21.com

Re: Values we share.

My official basic title is 'Mechanical Engineer (Toolmaker)'.
The 'Toolmaker' part refers to my specialisation (which was decided at the beginning of my apprenticeship, based on my qualifications from school)and as the training was to a higher and wider skill level I was required to achieve a higher technical qualification.
My classification as an apprentice was also different to, for example, a 'fitter and turner' apprentice. Toolmakers were 'Technician Apprentices', the rest 'Craft Apprentices'.I think this difference was in recognition of the fact that back then the Toolmaker was considered the most highly trained 'Hands On' worker in all engineering factories...Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

I'm just a bungling amateur. It's usually a case of "engine 'ere, engine there" in my workshop.

Re: Values we share.

You say that Rik...but someone who builds a really nice bike without the benefit of formal training has really completed a more difficult task. There are some clever people about...and some crap 'qualified' engineers ...Ian

email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com

Re: Values we share.

my apprenticeship was as a motor mechanic not as most people were motor fitters it was a 5 year one but i didnt complete it i joined up to get out of it without paying the forfit

email (option): roger.back@node6.com

Nieuwe pagina 1