Re: A poor substitute for Mega-Critic & a call for a better one
Chris, Stefan used a Bayesian approach as well, but instead of the average metascore and the average # of reviews he used the midpoint of the possible range and an arbitrary value (50 instead of 79.8 and 10 instead of 33.24), which gave albums with many reviews an advantage, aiming to predict the EOY lists. With your formula, the albums' number of reviews have a minor influence.
Re: A poor substitute for Mega-Critic & a call for a better one
Otisredding
I do not know if anyone is interested in this but I continue .
Otis, I think we're very interested in it - we needed something like this. I'm guessing everyone's waiting until the end to comment. Intriguing results so far - particularly the Girls album, which by my reckoning is only the 4th-most-acclaimed record to be released -yesterday-, showing up at #21.
Re: A poor substitute for Mega-Critic & a call for a better one
Thanks for doing this. Even though it's different from Mega-Critic, the continuity is impressive - the newer entries are slotted in pretty close to where they'd likely be on MC.