Questions? Looking for parts? Parts for sale? or just for a chat,
The WD Motorcycle forum
Hi,
Could use the series of part numbers for the guts of the early WM21.
Putting one unit back together but spread my flywheels and conrods around the shop and storage areas.
Did not wish to open up the complete WM21 on the bike to find out until no other option is found.
Did build a 600cc last summer but the bike was sold off quickly and I don't remember the piston number.
I am cleaning up a solid set of flywheels 66-635 with the conrod 66-481, I think this should work if I get the correct piston. What do ya think Ian?
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Hi Henri..Crankshaft flywheel sets were rationalised around a single set of forgings around 1949.
These were machined to suit the various engines for which they were used to give the correct stroke, balance etc.
Engines covered by this set of forgings were M20, M21, M33 and B33.
The forgings were numbered 66-635 (as yours are) so you will need to measure them to determine the stroke. Measure from the center of the big end to the center of the mainshaft. An M21 has a stroke of 112mm and the measurement described will be half of this....so for an M21 that will be 56mm.
M20 and M21 use the same conrod..these are listed as 66-480 in most parts lists but I know other numbers were used. To check, the rod should measure 8.250" (8 1/4") between centers....Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Hi Henri..look in the 'Technical Section' of the site under 'crankshaft specifications' for a detailed account of flywheel changes and numbers...Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
If your piston is still attached to the rod, the M21 gudgeon pin is set slightly further down than the M20's
email (option): davmax@ntlworld.com
Think I understand correctly, but coming up with about 46/7mm between from big end to center of mainshaft.
Center of the big end should be equivalent to the center of that bolt that locks in the crankpin, I am guessing, and that is pretty much standard on most of the flywheels I have, not all 66-635 for that matter.
Are you certain on that 56mm distance? I noticed last time that using a specific piston made it even at TDC while installing a WM20 piston left a substantial clearance below the cylinder surface.
Anyway, no worries and appreciate all of the info so far.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Thanks also Dave,
I remember the piston was a factor as well.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Hi Henri...The M20 has a stroke of 94mm. Half of that would be 47mm. So it looks like the wheels you are measuring are M20. Yes, I am sure about the 56mm dimension for the M21....Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Correct, I was just looking at the Service Sheet No. 701 and that confirms it.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Ian,
Still have more places to search but found the 66-635 with the 56mm set up with the conrod. Turns out the second flywheel is 66-708. Is it worth keeping/using as an unmatched set?
Have pulled the set apart, conrod had too much sideplay. Rollers were .246.
I think they are supposed to be .250 as I remember.
The crankpin is 32.249mm. May have to replace that as well.
Will see if I come up with a matched set on the 56mm wheels.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Hi Henri..Cast iron M21 flywheels were numbered 66-705 and 66-707. 66-635 wheels were steel with both halves having the same number.
Mixing flywheel halves is not recommended but is possible if everything trues up ok on assembly.
66-708 is not a number I am familiar with...could you check that you have read it correctly and that it is not 705 or 707?....Post a picture if possible..Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Thanks Henri...I will have to go back to all my crank info. and make sure I haven't made a numbering mistake. It is clearly 708.
Hopefully I have...otherwise I have to track down that number!!....Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Five years ago when I dismantled and bubbled packed the sets of flywheel, I had coded each, found the corresponding timing wheel 66-634 as originally matched to the flywheel.
Now to follow Dave's instructions on the 100 pounds tightening and perhaps roller change.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
Hi Henri...well according to me 66-634 should go with 66-636 to make a pair of flywheels. Clearly things have got mixed up...but that still leaves the question as to where 66-708 came from!.I have checked my parts lists and cannot find any reference to it.
I don't have a 38 or 39 parts list though...maybe it appears there.
Oddly (as well) the parts lists show the conrod for both models as 66-480 but they are frequently marked 66-481 and again I haven't found that number yet in a parts list....very odd.
Does anyone have the 38 and 39 parts list to check this out?...Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Found the drive side and turns out to be 66-708 as well. Same number used on both the drive and the timing sides.
56mm for sure.
I will see if I can locate my 1939 part list.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
email (option): n.gentner@bigpond.com
phew!! neale what a genius it went over my head after the first sentence
Hi Neale...Interesting stuff. It seems to me though that there are problems now in writing up a definitive list of flywheel numbers.
With all the parts lists available it should be possible to make a list of all the part numbers for the different models. However, if those numbers are not on the flywheels themselves identification outside of the engine becomes complicated.
For example a B31 and a B29/B30 share the same forging numbers, are the same stroke and share the same shaft dimensions but are not physically the same, as the finished wheels are machined differently.
Also there are the material differences in the M Series types with some being cast iron and some steel...an important difference if you were to consider extensive lightening when tuning an engine for example.
Thus in a practical sense a full list of PART numbers has little value..you can't order new ones and you can't identify the ones you have using that information.
Similarly, a full list of forging numbers, if it existed, wouldn't identify the flywheels either.(as in the case of the B29/30/31.)
It appears that the original piece I entered into the 'technical section' is not a valid document and would best be removed to avoid confusion.
The origin of this posting was Henri's problem in identifying flywheels that were not fitted into an engine.
Stroke, shaft dimensions etc. etc. appear to be the only guide in this situation and familiarity with the physical differences between cast and forged flywheels the only way to identify material type visually.
In the case of the B29/30/31 you would have to actually know the difference between the two types to identify them once separated from their crankcases unless a full set of dimensions were available.
To summarise it therefore appears that detailed dimensional information may be the only way to go to resolve the problem of correct model identification, leaving the question of determining material type still unresolved..unless this can be done with forging numbers..Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com
Henri,
Your dimension of 46-47mm tallies with actual measurement of 47mm which denotes a stroke of 94mm, which means your selected crankshaft is M20 at best. Most definitely not 112mm stroke M21. Just because it may have come out of a set of M21 crankcases means nothing. You need to find a pair of flywheels which measure 56mm for them to be M21.
Re M20 piston on M21 crank: Henri, I think you must be mistaken here. An M20 piston should pop out of bore at TDC if installed on std M21 crank and rod.
However, an M21 piston on a std M20 crank and rod would not reach gasket face as you describe.
"First, do no harm"
Neale.
email (option): n.gentner@bigpond.com
Thanks Ian and Neale,
Have mated all loose flywheels and conrods based on comments above.
Much obliged. Great reading but what a task. You are right on the piston Neale and I will find out when I get the flywheels inside the cases. I will send you a photo. It was getting a bit confusing working with 12 different sets of 500cc and 600cc.
email (option): unpob@yahoo.com
email (option): n.gentner@bigpond.com
I'm being careful now Neale and any comments I make are subject to confirmation. The later 66-635 wheels used for both M20,21 and M33 and B33 are steel forgings and to my knowledge B series motors were never fitted with cast iron flywheels...So, it may well be that 600 (forging/casting) numbers denote steel flywheels and 700 cast.
We know both the M20 and M21 were fitted with flywheels of either material at different times.
I have to say I am not as familiar with the pre war engines as you are...how does that statement relate to the M23 and earlier M20/21?
I think you are right..somewhere in amongst all the information is probably a clear and logical story.
I have a lot of flywheels from the wartime and post war periods and can 'spot the difference' between cast and steel types visually..really I need to go through these noting numbers, types and materials.
I have no pre war flywheels, either SV or OHV so cannot make any physical observations regarding these.
Also Henri's 708 numbered flywheels are new to me..though it is possible I may have some in the pile and not have noticed them !.The only 'non numbered' types I recall were all cast iron ones, but as I say I feel I need to revisit everything I have in store.
I will try to allocate a day to this task and will note material, model type and any numbering present. I would like to get to the bottom of this subject!!...Ian
email (option): julie@wright52.plus.com